Toxic Drugs Weapons, Industry / Health / Armament

Did an experimental military vaccine kill in 1918, 50 at 100 million people accusing “spanish flu”?

News impacting health.

The experience with the bacterial vaccine 1918 to 1919, may have killed 50 at 100 millions of people.  

by Kevin Barry, President of First Freedoms, Inc.

Fort Riley soldiers, Kansas, sick with the Spanish flu in a hospital at Camp Funston

Spanish flu 1918 was truly a bioterrorist attack on humanity.

The “spanish flu” killed around 50 at 100 million people during a pandemic of 1918 to 1919.

And, if the story told about this pandemic is not true?

If the deadly infection was neither of influenza nor of Spanish origin?

Analyzed documents, recently, reveal that the “spanish flu” was a military vaccination experiment gone wrong.

Thinking back to the 100th anniversary of the end of the First World War, it would be good to dig deeper into the subject to solve this mystery.


Non-influenza pandemic

  • The reason why, modern technology is unable to locate the killer flu strain of this pandemic, it's because the flu was not the culprit.
  • When, from the First World War, more soldiers died from illnesses than from bullets.

Bacterial pneumonia

  • The pandemic did not come from influenza. Car 95% or more of the deaths were caused by bacterial pneumonia. And, it is not due to the flu or a virus.
  • The pandemic was not Spanish. The first cases of bacterial pneumonia, in 1918, date back to a military base in Fort Riley, au Kansas.
  • Of 21 January to 4 June 1918, a experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine grown on horses par le Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research (At New York) is injected to soldiers in Fort Riley.


  • Towards the end 1918, these soldiers living and traveling in poor sanitary conditions are sent to Europe to fight. On the front line in the trenches, they spread bacteria at every stop between Kansas and France.
  • One study described soldiers “with active infections (who) have diffused bacteria (——).
    • “People with active infections were spread bacteria who colonized their nose and throat. While others (bacteria), often, in the same “respiratory tracts”, were deeply susceptible to invasion. And they spread quickly through their lungs using their own bacteria or those of other colonized people..” (1)

Bacterial pneumonia attacking the weakest

  • The “spanish flu” attacked healthy people in their prime (young people). And, bacterial pneumonia has attacked the elderly and immunocompromised.
  • At the end of World War I, the 11 November 1918, the soldiers returned to their country of origin. And, their colonial outposts, have spread the deadly bacterial pneumonia around the world.
  • Pendant, World War I, le ‘Rockefeller Institute’ also sent the anti-meningococcal serum’ in England, in France, in Belgium, and Italy, and other countries.

So, they helped spread the epidemic around the world.

During the pandemic of 1918 at 1919, this so-called “Spanish flu” killed 50 at 100 millions of people. Including many soldiers.  

A lot of people don't realize, that disease has killed many more soldiers of all stripes than machine guns or mustard gas, or any other element, usually, associated with WWI.

Personally, I am concerned about the Spanish flu. Among those killed by the disease 1918 at 1919 are members of both sides of my family.  

My father's grandmother, Sadie Hoyt, died of pneumonia in 1918. Sadie was Chief Yeoman in the Navy. My grandmother left Rosemary and her sister Anita who are being raised by their aunt. And, his sister, Marian, joined the Navy. She died of “the flu” in 1919.  

On my mother's side, two of his father's sisters died in childhood. All of my deceased family members lived in New York.  

I suspect that many families in America and around the world have been similarly affected. By this mysterious Spanish flu.

In 1918, "flu" was a catch-all term for a disease of unknown origin. It didn’t have the specific meaning it has today.  

It meant a mysterious disease that fell from the sky.

In fact, in the astrological sense, the flu comes from medieval Latin “influent”, that is, a visit under the influence of the stars.


Between 1900 and 1920, enormous efforts are being made in the industrialized world to build a better society.

I'll take the example of New York to discuss three major changes, in the society, that occurred during this period, and their impacts on mortality from infectious diseases.

1. Clean water and sanitation

At the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, New York built an amazing system to bring clean water to the city from the Catskills. A system still used today.

There was also the construction of more than 6000 miles of sewers to carry, treat waste and protect drinking water.

The World Health Organization recognizes the importance ofdrinking water and sanitation in the fight against infectious diseases. (2)

2. Electricity

End of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th century, New York built an electric and wired grid to the city.

To, that electricity is available, in every house.

Electricity enables refrigeration which is an unsung hero. A benefit for public health.

When food is refrigerated, from farm to table, the public is protected against potential infectious diseases.

Cheap renewables are important for many reasons.

Especially, they are, required, in the fight against infectious diseases.

3. Pharmaceutical

At the end of the 19th century and until the beginning of the 20th century, New York became the home of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research (now Rockefeller University). The Institute is at the origin of the modern pharmaceutical industry.

The Institute pioneered the approaches that the pharmaceutical industry uses to this day.

Also, in the preparation of vaccine sera, For the best or for the worst.

The vaccine from the Fort Riley experience, on soldiers, has been produced on horses.

Data on death rates, in the United States from the beginning of the 20th century to 1965, clearly indicate that drinking water, flush toilets, sewer systems and refrigerated food, all combined reduced, effectively, mortality from infectious diseases.

This has been found before that vaccines against these diseases are not available.

Have Doctors and Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Reap the Honors Rightly Belonging to Others? To drillers, plumbers, electricians and engineers who have helped reduce mortality from infectious diseases?

In 1918, if the pride of the Rockefeller Institute led to a pandemic that has killed millions of people; what lessons should we learn and apply in 2018?


Few months ago, watching an episode of American Experience on PBS, I am surprised to hear that the first cases of "Spanish flu" occurred in Fort Riley, au Kansas, in 1918.   

I thought. How is it possible that this event, there is 100 years, historically important, could be so misnamed?

And that there was never a correction?  

Why “Spanish”?

Most of the countries participating in the war have censored their press.

And, Spain was one of the few countries not involved in World War I.

Free from censorship issues, the first press reports, reporting people dying in large numbers from diseases, came from Spain.

The belligerent countries did not want to frighten the troops, and so they were content with the scapegoat: Spain.

Which is quite scary. This is what soldiers from all sides have been asked to (all parties at war) to cross the forbidden zone (the conflict zone) machine gun fire, without knowing that the trenches were a breeding ground for disease.

It’s high time to remove “the Spanish” from any discussion of this pandemic.

Since the flu originated from a military base in the United States, au Kansas.

The disease could and should have been better qualified.

In order to prevent future disasters, United States [and the rest of the world] must examine, carefully and really, the cause of the pandemic.

It is possible, that one of the reasons, for which the Spanish flu has never been requalified, it is because it helps to hide the origin of the pandemic.  

If the origin of the pandemic involved a vaccination experiment on American soldiers, the United States might prefer to call it the Spanish flu instead of the Fort Riley bacteria, of 1918 [or something similar].

The Spanish flu started where this experimental bacterial vaccine was given.

The prime suspect as the source of the bacterial infections that have killed so many lies in Fort Riley.

It would be much harder to maintain the marketing mantra, “vaccines that save lives”, if a vaccine experience originated in the United States, during its initial manufacture, caused the death of 50 at 100 millions of people.

“Vaccines save lives, except that, we may have killed 50 at 100 million people 1918 to 1919 ”.

This sales slogan would be less effective than the overly simplistic one: “Vaccines save lives”.



In the middle of the years 2000, there has been a lot of talk about "pandemic preparedness".

In the USA, influenza vaccine makers have received billions of taxpayer dollars to develop vaccines. And, to make sure you don't have another deadly 'flu' pandemic.

Profiting from the “flu”, as being an integral part of the Spanish flu, helped vaccine makers obtain billion dollar checks from governments.

However, at the time, scientists knew bacterial pneumonia was the real culprit.

This is not from my point of view.

Bacterial pneumonia was the real culprit

Thousands of autopsies confirm this state of affairs.

In an article published in 2008, by the National Institute of Health [NIH], autopsies reveal bacterial pneumonia killed, at least 92,7%, deceased people, between 1918 and 1919.

The numbers are likely to be greater than 92,7%.

Researchers examined more than 9 000 autopsies.

The finding is “than no lung culture results (bacterial) is negative”.

“In the 68 higher quality autopsy series, for which the possibility of undeclared negative cultures could be excluded. 92,7% autopsy lung cultures are positive for ≥ 1 bacterium.”

“On a study of approximately 9000 subjects followed, from their clinical profile with influenza to resolution or autopsy.”

“The researchers obtained with a sterile technique: cultures of pneumococci or streptococci on 164 of 167 lung tissue samples.”  

 “There was 89 pure cultures of pneumococci. 19 only streptococcal cultures are recovered; 34 gave mixtures of pneumococci and / or streptococci; 22 gave a mixture of pneumococci, streptococci and other organisms (evidence of pneumococci and non-hemolytic streptococci); and 3 produced nonhemolytic streptococci alone.”

“There were no negative lung culture results.” (3)

Pneumococci or streptococci have been found in “164 of (167) lung tissue samples” autopsied.

This accounts for a percentage of 98,2%.

Bacteria are the culprits.



When the United States declared war (avril 1917), the nascent pharmaceutical industry received a windfall.

She had never had it before.

She received a large quantity of guinea pigs thanks to the first US military project.

Before the war in 1917, the American army counted 286 000 men. After the war in 1920, the US military is demobilizing and counting 296 000 men.

During the war years, of 1918 at 1919, the US military has climbed to 6.000.000 men, with 2.000.000 men sent abroad.

The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research took advantage of this new pool of human guinea pigs to conduct vaccine experiments.


By Frederick L. Gates
From the base hospital, Fort Riley, Kansas, et le Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, New York.
Received on 20 July 1918

[Author's Note: please read the Fort Riley report in its entirety. So that you can appreciate the carefree experiments carried out on these troops.]

Between the 21 January and 4 June 1918, Dr Gates reports an experience where soldiers received 3 doses of a bacterial meningitis vaccine.

Those who carried out the experiment on the soldiers used only primary dosages of a modified vaccine serum inside the horses.

The immunization regimen was designed to be 3 doses.

4 792 men received the first dose, but only 4 257 received the second dose [a drop 11%].

And only 3702 received all three doses (a drop 22,7%).

In total, 1 090 men were not there, for the third dose.

What happened to these soldiers?

Were they sent east by train from Kansas to board a ship to Europe?

Were they at Fort Riley Hospital?

Dr. Gates' report tells us nothing about this.

In March of the same year, “100 men a day” entered the Fort Riley Infirmary.

Are any of these men missing from Dr Gates report? Those who did not receive the 2nd or 3rd dose?

“[…] Shortly before breakfast, Monday 11 mars, the first domino would fall, signaling the onset of the first wave of the flu 1918.

The company cook, Albert Gitchell, showed up at the camp infirmary to complain about a 'bad cold'.

Right behind him, le caporal Lee W. Drake voiced similar complaints.

AT midi, camp surgeon Edward R. Schreiner had more than 100 sick men on hands, all apparently suffering from the same disease […]” (5) 

Gates reports that several of the men in the experiment had flu-like symptoms: cough, vomiting and diarrhea after receiving the vaccine.  

These symptoms are a disaster for the men living in barracks, traveling by train to the atlantic coast, sailing to Europe, living and fighting in the trenches.  

The unsanitary conditions at each stage of the journey are a ideal environment for contagious disease like the spread of bacterial pneumonia.  

Extract from Dr Gates report:


– “[…] Several cases of sagging intestines or transient diarrhea are noted. This symptom has never happened before. Thorough investigation of individual cases often revealed that men who complained of the effects of vaccination suffered from mild coryza., bronchitis, etc. At the time of injection.”

“Sometimes, the reaction started with a chill or a feeling of cold. And, a number of men complained of fever or feverishness the following night.”
“Then comes nausea [occasional vomiting], dizziness.

Then, aches and pains’ general in joints and muscles.”

In some cases they were particularly localized in the neck or lumbar region, causing stiff neck or back.

A few injections were followed by diarrhea.

So, reactions sometimes simulated the onset of epidemic meningitis.

And, several vaccinated men are sent as suspects to the base hospital for diagnosis.” (4)

According to, Gates, they injected random doses of an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine into the soldiers.

Thereafter, some soldiers exhibited symptoms that ‘mimicked’ meningitis.

However, Dr Gates makes the fantastic claim, according to which, it was not a true meningitis.

The soldiers developed flu-like symptoms.

Bacterial meningitis, yesterday and today, is known for mimic flu-like symptoms. (6)

The similarity of the first symptoms of bacterial meningitis, bacterial pneumonia, with flu symptoms, maybe the reason why, vaccine experiments at Fort Riley escaped scrutiny, as a potential cause of the Spanish flu.

And this for more than 100 years.


There is an element of perfect storm in the spread of Gates bacteria.

World War I only ended 10 months after the first injections.

Unfortunately for these 50 at 100 million dead, these soldiers infected with infused bacteria, in horses, moved quickly during these 10 month.

A article from 2008 on the CDC website describes how sick soldiers from World War I could transmit the bacteria to others, by becoming “cloud adults” [“cloud adults”].

‘Cloud adults’

“For brief periods and to varying degrees, the affected hosts became “cloud adults” who developed colonizing bacteria strains via the respiratory route, especially pneumococci, hemolytic streptococci, H. influenzae et S. aureus.
For several days during local epidemics, in particular, in crowded places such as hospital wards, military camps, troopships and mines (and the trenches), some people were immunologically susceptible to infections with the influenza virus, infected or recovering.

People with active infections were spread bacteria who colonized their nose and throat. While others (bacteria), often, in the same “respiratory tracts”, were deeply susceptible to invasion. And they spread quickly through their lungs using their own bacteria or those of other colonized people..” (1)

Three times in his report on the Fort Riley's vaccine experiment, Dr Gates states that some soldiers had a "severe reaction" indicating a "unusual individual sensitivity to the vaccine”.  

Although the vaccine has sickened many, he only killed those predisposed to catch him.

Those who got sick, who survived became “cloud adults”.

They spread the bacteria to others, what created more adults of the cloud, spreading to others, where he killed the vulnerable. The cycle repeated until there were no more unsanitary conditions in wartime. And, that there are no more millions of soldiers to experience.  

The toll of American troops is enormous and it is well documented.

Dr. Carol Byerly describes how the 'flu' traveled like wildfire through the US military.

(Replace “flu” or “virus” from Dr Byerly by “bacteria”)

“[…] Fourteen of the largest training camps reported influenza outbreaks in March, april or may, and some of the infected troops took the virus with them on board ships, in France. […]

So, that the soldiers in the trenches were getting sick, the military evacuated them from the front lines, and replaced them with healthy men.

This process has continuously brought the virus into contact with new hosts, young people, healthy soldiers, in which he could adapt, reproduce and become extremely virulent without danger of exhaustion.

[…] Before any travel ban can be imposed.

A contingent of replacement troops has left Camp Devens [outside of Boston] for Camp Upton, in le Long Island, the army landing point for France, and they took the flu with them.

Upton's doctors said she arrived "roughly" on 13 September 1918, with 38 hospital admissions, followed by 86 the next day, and of 193 the next day.

Hospital admissions peaked on 4 October with 483, et en 40 days, Upton camp sent 6 131 men in hospital with flu.

Some have developed pneumonia, so quickly that the doctors have diagnosed simply by lit is observant, rather than listening to the lungs […]” (7) 

The United States isn't the only country with the Rockefeller Institute's experimental bacterial vaccine.

A report of 1919 of the Institute declares:

“It should be mentioned, than before the United States entered the war [in April 1917], the Institute had resumed the preparation of meningococcal serum, in order to meet the demands of England, from France, from Belgium, from Italy and other countries. "

The same precise report:

“In order to meet the demand, suddenly increased curative serums developed at the Institute, a special stable for horses was quickly erected […]” (8) 

Experimental meningoccal serum modified in horses is injected into soldiers, who entered the cramped and unhealthy living conditions, from the war ... and, it will be perfect, that's it ?    

Is it the bacterial serum made in horses at the Rockefeller Institute, injected to American soldiers and distributed to many other countries, who is responsible for the death of 50 at 100 millions of people, in 1918 at 1919?

And, is it the cause of bacterial lung infections?

The Institute claims to have distributed the bacterial serum in England, in France, in Belgium, in Italy and other countries during World War I.

It is not clear enough how these countries experienced their soldiers.  

I hope that independent researchers will honestly examine these questions..


I don't think anyone involved, in these vaccine experiments, tried to harm anyone.  

Some will see the name Rockefeller and scream. “Illuminati!”Or“ slaughter the herd!”

I don't believe this happened.

I believe standard medical pride is responsible, doctors “play God”, thinking they can tame nature, without creating unforeseen events.  

With medical pride, I don't think the situation has changed significantly over the years. 100 last years.

AND NOW? The vaccine industry is always on the lookout for human subjects.

They are most successful when they can find populations that are not able to refuse.  

The soldiers (9), infants, handicapped, prisoners, those of developing countries; anyone who is unable to refuse.

Experimentation with vaccines in vulnerable populations is not a problem of the past.

Watch this video by Dr Stanley Plotkin where he describes the use of experimental vaccines on orphans, the mentally retarded, prisoners and people under colonial rule.  

The deposition took place in January 2018.

The pride of the medical community is the same or worse 100 years.  

Dr Plotkin admits to writing:

“The question is whether we should experiment on adults, fully functional, and on children who can contribute to society.

Or carry out preliminary studies on children and adults who are in the form of humans, but have no social potential.”

Please listen to this horrible video. (10)

The international community is well aware of medical pride and the poor record of medical ethics.

This is partly why, the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights developed international standards regarding the right to informed consent, for preventive medical procedures, like vaccination.  

The international community is well aware that the pharmaceutical industry makes mistakes, and that she is always looking for human subjects.

The Declaration states that individuals have the fundamental right to consent to any preventive medical intervention such as vaccination.  

Article 3 - Human dignity and human rights     

1. Human dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms must be fully respected.  

2. The interests and well-being of the individual must take priority over the sole interest of science or society.

Article 6 - Consent  

1. Any preventive medical intervention, diagnostic and therapeutic should only be carried out with prior consent, free and informed of the person concerned, on the basis of adequate information.  

Consent must be explicit, and if necessary it can be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time.

And, for whatever reason, without prejudice or prejudicial. (11)  

Drinking water, sanitation, flush toilets, refrigerated foods and healthy diets have and still do, much more, to protect mankind from infectious diseases that any vaccination program.

The doctor and the vaccine industry have usurped the credit that rightfully belongs to plumbers, electricians, drillers, engineers and planners.

For these reasons, the decisions-makers, at all levels, of government must protect the human rights and individual freedoms of individuals. And, opt out of vaccination programs through waivers.

The pride of the medical community will never go away.

Policymakers need to know that vaccines like all medical interventions are not foolproof.  

Vaccines are not magic. We all have a different susceptibility to disease. Human beings are not one size fits all.

In 1918-1919, the vaccine industry carried out an experiment on soldiers which produced disastrous results.  

In 2018, the vaccine industry is experimenting, daily, infants.

The immunization schedule has never tested as directed.

The results of the experiment are as follows: 1 american child on 7 is in some form of special education, and over 50% have some form of chronic disease. (12)

In 1918-1919, there was no safety follow-up after the vaccine was delivered.

In 2018, there is virtually no security monitoring, after delivery of a vaccine.

Who gave you that flu shot at Rite Aid?

Do you have the store employee's phone number in case of a problem??  

[Rite Aid is an American drugstore chain. She owned nearly 4700 points of sale in 2011.]


In 1918-19, there was no liability to the manufacturer for injuries or deaths caused by vaccines.  

In 2018, vaccine manufacturers are exempt from all liability for injury or death caused by vaccines which have been developed, in 1986. (13)  

Of 1918 at 1919, no independent investigation has been put in place to challenge the official history, according to which, the “spanish flu” was a mysterious disease that fell from the sky.

I suspect many of those at the Rockefeller Institute knew what happened, and that many of the doctors who administered the vaccines to the troops knew what happened.

But these people are dead.  

In 2018, the pharmaceutical industry is the biggest campaign donor to politicians, and the biggest advertiser in all media.

So not much has changed since 100 years.

This story will be, probably, ignored by mainstream media, since their salaries are paid by pharmaceutical advertising.  

Next time you hear someone say 'vaccines save lives'; remember that the real story, the cost-benefit ratio of vaccines, is much more complicated than their three-word slogan.

Also remember that the vaccines may have killed 50 at 100 million people between 1918 and 1919.

If that is the case, these costs far outweigh any advantages.

Especially since plumbers, electricians, drillers and engineers have done and continue to do the real work of reducing disease mortality.   

Vaccines are not magic. Human rights and bioethics are of crucial importance. Policy makers should understand the history of medical pride and protect individual and parental human rights as outlined in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.


Did a Military Experimental Vaccine in 1918 Kill 50-100 Million People Blamed as “Spanish Flu”? – On Health Impact News

Kevin Barry is the President of First Freedoms, Inc. a 501.c.3. He is a former federal attorney, a rep at the UN HQ in New York and the author of Vaccine Whistleblower: Exposing Autism Research Fraud at the CDC. Please support our work at

Please direct media inquiries to [email protected]

Originally published at Reprinted with permission.

Comment on this article at

Dailycensorship – Neilly Free Mind (Translation)

Son about Vaccines

  1. Vaccines
  2. Vaccines


  • [Update of the article on 04 – 02 – 2021] Geneticist Alexandra Henrion-Caude Warns of Dangers of RNA Genetic Therapy Vaccine.

[Long interview version HERE.]


1. Deaths from Bacterial Pneumonia during 1918–19 Influenza Pandemic
John F. Brundage* and G. Dennis Shanks†
Author affiliations: *Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA; †Australian Army Malaria Institute, Enoggera, Queensland, Australia

2.  World Health Organization: Unsafe drinking water, sanitation and waste management

3. J Infect Dis. 2008 Oct 1; 198(7): 962–970.
Predominant Role of Bacterial Pneumonia as a Cause of Death in Pandemic Influenza: Implications for Pandemic Influenza Preparedness
David M. Morens, Jeffery K. Taubenberger, and Anthony S. Fauci

4. PDF of Fort Riley Study (1918)

5. American Experience, “The First Wave”, PBS

6. Mayo Clinic:  Meningitis

7. Public Health Rep. 2010; 125(Suppl 3): 82–91.
The U.S. Military and the Influenza Pandemic of 1918–1919
Carol R. Byerly, PhD

8.  Rockefeller Institute pamphlet PDF (1919)

9.  Is Military Research Hazardous to Veterans’ Health? Lessons Spanning Half a Century, A Staff Report Prepared for the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, United States Senate, December 1994

10. Dr. Stanley Plotkin: vaccine experiments on orphans, the mentally retarded, and others (January 2018)

11.  Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (19 October 2005)

12. CDC Offers New Stats On Disability Prevalence

13. 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act

You may also like...


  1. […] according to reports, a vaccine injected into soldiers at Fort Riley, against bacterial meningitis grown in horses [by the Rockefeller Institute for […]

  2. Anonymous says:

    Corona is the flu for me. Once the fear is installed, people are able to get vaccinated to end it. In 18 they used the soldiers to inject their poison. Today they use fear to get volunteers.

  3. […] After lighting on the “spanish flu” which masked the origin of the pandemic of 1918. […]

  4. Anonymous says:

    “Although the first known cases appeared in the United States, it has been given the name "Spanish flu" because Spain - not involved in World War I - was the only country to freely publish information about this epidemic.”

    1. Neilly Freemind says:

      I rephrased the sentence to make it clearer.

      Tk y

  5. Bauchet says:

    It is from the last century that we should have wondered about the positive or negative consequences of vaccines instead of just thinking about making money. After all the great epidemics that have ravaged the world have only a limited lifespan and only the right sanitary measures (water, habitat, hygiene) have fought more effectively against pandemics than vaccines. Only here are hygiene measures do not bring much, otherwise nothing in the hold of sharks eager for phynance à la Jarry.

  6. Anonymous says:


  7. […] Reports show that this serum which was injected into American soldiers and distributed to many other countries, is responsible for the death of 50 at 100 million people between 1918-19. […]

  8. […] At the start of the coronavirus plandemia, I suspected that this so-called killer virus may have something to do with a vaccination gone wrong, like that of 1918. […]

  9. […] Did an experimental military vaccine kill in 1918, 50 at 100 million people accusing … […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.